Political
Broadcasting by Independent
Committees:
A
Proposal for Eliminating the Federal Communications
Commission’s PACcess Doctrine*
by Kenneth M. Kwartler
Published May
1984
64 Boston University Law Review
625
Excerpt
Independent political
committees (IPCs) 1 are rapidly becoming the
dominant political entities of the 1980s. IPCs were
rejuvenated by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
(FECA), 2 which curtailed sharply
the campaign finance abilities of individuals while placing
comparatively fewer restrictions on IPCs' abilities to
raise, contribute, and spend money during federal
campaigns. 3 IPCs have become
reservoirs of political funds no longer directly
contributable to candidates; they channel these funds to
activities intended to advance a particular candidate or
political view. 4 IPCs, especially political
action committees (PACs), 5 have grown markedly in
both numbers and influence. 6
There is a growing concern that the financial clout of IPCs
may have an inordinate effect upon the governmental
behavior of elected officials. 7 Recognizing the importance
of IPC support, legislators may be motivated to adjust
their voting either to attract IPC funds for themselves, or
at least to minimize those likely to reach an
opponent. 8 As a result, IPCs have
become a substantial force in both elections and
congressional behavior in a remarkably short time.
A large share of IPC expenditures has gone toward political
broadcasting. 9 However, the emergence of
IPCs as significant political broadcast entities was
largely unanticipated by federal communications policy. In
addition, it has come at a time when both the broadcast
industry and government officials seek to remove the
existing balance provisions that govern campaign
broadcasting. 10 Consequently, IPCs have
been left largely untouched by the current political
broadcasting regulatory scheme, and recent ...
Remainder of the 65-page
article can be found at this Lexis/Nexis
page.
*
The PACcess Doctrine is not an actual doctrine of law. It
is the result of a series of recent FCC rulings enhancing
substantially the broadcast position of political action
committees (PACs), see infra note 5, and other independent
political committees (IPCs), see infra note 1, in
contravention of existing law and policy. These rulings are
discussed in Part III infra and are herein collectively
referred to as the PACcess Doctrine.